Happy
Tolerance Day
Frederick
Meekins
12/14/2002
That’s
right --- "Happy Tolerance Day." Use to be this time of year
Americans greeted one another with a hearty "Merry Christmas".
However, if the minions of political correctness continue to foist their
intellectual swill upon the nation’s culture, the Yuletide season will
come to symbolize something else entirely.
On "The O’Reilly Factor", Bill recently confronted feminist
agitator Patricia Ireland about Planned Parenthood’s "Choice On
Earth" holiday cards. Ireland responded by saying, "I can’t
think of a better time of year to remind everyone of the need for tolerance
among the major religious groups and among individuals."
Planned Parenthood concurred with Ireland’s assessment in a statement
posted on the group’s website concluding, "Planned Parenthood
believes in every individual’s right to make choices and live in peace
with our planet and wishes people of all beliefs a peaceful and safe
holiday season." If NOW and Planned Parenthood hags are out fostering
a spirit of diversity and tolerance throughout this festive period, I’d
hate to see an organization imposing a uniformity of thought.
These groups and their liberal sympathizers are out to promote something
this Christmas. But it’s definitely not goodwill and human understanding,
especially if tolerance and inclusion mean celebrating ideas you don’t
necessarily agree with as multiculturalists harp ad nauseam.
Planned Parenthood said of the arm of the American Life League publicizing
the scandal of these blasphemous Advent placards, "...this
organization ... serves no redeeming purpose.." If Planned Parenthood
really "believes in every individual’s right to make choices"
who are they to say an organization serves no redeeming purpose when the
ethical standards endorsed by the abortion crowd are reducible to the
pragmatics of relativistic individualism?
As with its other varieties, it seem the Christmas brand of tolerance does
not apply to those embracing America’s traditional Christian values
either. One New Jersey school cancelled a trip to see A Christmas Carol ---
talk about a bunch of Scrooges --- because Christian references might
offend non-Christian students. Should the same degree of concern be shown
to the sensibilities of Caucasian students disturbed by the unbridled
racial histrionics allowed to run rampant all February long and for much of
January and March for that matter?
The school’s spineless principal told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution
that this literary classic "did not mesh with the class’ curriculum
[no doubt because Dickens being a dead white male]." and "there
is a great sensitivity to putting students in awkward situations."
Wonder if these mental sensors will be as quick to cut sex-ed and evolution
from Biology class.
This prejudice has taken on such ridiculous proportions that these Grinches
have metastasized beyond the holiday’s outrightly religious message to
take offense at its symbols once providing a great deal of aesthetic joy.
According to Robert Knight in the Nov/Dec. 2002 issue of Family Voice, this
hatred towards God and all things holy runs so deep that many retailers
refuse to place stars atop their display trees as a conscientious effort to
thumb their noses at the King of Kings. Even Chick-fil-a, the fast food
chicken chain that makes a self-righteous spectacle of itself by closing
every Sunday, barely acknowledges the existence of Christmas.
In Pittsburgh, concerned residents there had to fight to get annual
December celebrations re-upgraded to a generic "holiday" status.
Humbugs in that Pennsylvania metropolis had reduced the Christmas season to
a mere "Winter Sparkle Festival", going so far as to downplay
traditional decorations in favor of stars and sparkles.
In Australia, a number of daycare centers won’t let jolly Ole St. Nick
darken their classroom doorways for fear of offending immigrants and
minorities. Instead schools will emphasize culturally inclusive figures
such as Fairies and Elves.
Most adherents of these minority persuasions are not native to the Land
Down Under. They should have known what they were getting into before they
migrated there. Westerners are always being lectured as to our need to
honor other cultures. Isn’t it about time those from the backwards
nations of the earth reciprocate with due homage and deference?
A "spokeswoman" for the Swinburne University of Technology in
Melbourne told the Sunday Mail there, "As a university, we have to be
sensitive to the views of minority groups." But won’t the majestic
and ethereal Elves portrayed in The Lord of the Rings feel unjustly
stereotyped if pre-school students see the primary function of these beings
as wrapping presents and baking cookies? And what about the Hobbits;
won’t they feel their culture diminished by all the attention focused on
the Elves? The last thing you want to face, my friend, is a gaggle of
disgruntled Hobbits.
We can all sit back and laugh at this --- unless of course mirth has become
yet another celebratory quality banished by the ranks of the politically
correct --- but these conflicts have ramifications beyond entertaining us
on cold December evenings. These secularists hope to engineer every
religious reference from society’s vocabulary in the hopes of enshrining
their own dogmatic absolutist tolerance as the established creed.
At Patuxent Elementary in Lusby, Maryland, my cousin’s son was sent to
the principal’s office for uttering "God bless you" after a
classmate sneezed. School officials informed my irate cousin, who was
called up to the school in the same manner as if her offspring had cussed
out his teacher, that her son must desist in offering this traditional
benediction since it offended atheists and Jews in the class.
Thus, my young cousin was forbidden from vocalizing his own religious
culture and ethos. Yet for the school to have known the preferences of
these unbelieving students, someone must have expressed them.
So why are they allowed to speak up and Christian children ordered to
remain silent? More importantly, if Christians are told to no longer
enunciate idioms harkening back to the religious origins of America’s
culture since doing so would be to impose them upon those who do not share
them, why are those who do not have Christian convictions allowed to impose
their’s upon the rest of us? What if a Christian child is offended by
some atheist brat who refuses to button their lip?
Some might consider making tolerance the highest ideal the best thing they
could find under their tree (or whatever other green thing makes them warm
and fuzzy all over) this "holiday season". However, as everyone
that was once a child eventually realizes, not every gift is all its
cracked up to be.
Frederick B.
Meekins
American
WorldView Dispatch
Copyright 2002
by Frederick Meekins
Join Junto
Society Adults
fm_htd_121402.html
